Qadianiyyah in Islam: Beliefs, History, Leaders and Scholarly Rulings
Introduction
Qadianiyyah, also known as the Ahmadiyya movement, is a religious movement founded by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian (1839–1908) in British India. The movement takes its name from Qadian, a town in Punjab where its founder was born and where the movement developed.
The central theological issue concerning Qadianiyyah is the status that its founder claimed for himself. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad made a number of claims during his lifetime, including claims concerning the Promised Messiah, the Mahdi, and prophethood. These claims conflict with the Islamic doctrine that Muhammad ﷺ is the final Prophet.
Allah says:
مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِنْ رِجَالِكُمْ وَلَٰكِنْ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ ۗ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمًا
“Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the Seal of the Prophets. And Allah is All-Knowing of everything.”
Qur'an 33:40
The Prophet ﷺ also said:
«وَأَنَا خَاتَمُ النَّبِيِّينَ لَا نَبِيَّ بَعْدِي»
“I am the Seal of the Prophets; there is no prophet after me.”
Sahih al-Bukhari; Sahih Muslim
Thus, the finality of Prophethood is an established principle of Islamic creed.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad al-Qadiani was born in Qadian, Punjab, in 1839 and died in 1908.
He initially presented himself as a defender of Islam and wrote extensively in response to Christian missionaries and other religious opponents. Over time, however, his claims developed considerably. He claimed to be the Promised Messiah and Mahdi and eventually used language concerning prophethood and divine revelation that led Muslim scholars to reject his claims as incompatible with Islam.
Among his well-known writings are:
Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya
Izala-e-Auham
Anjam-e-Atham
I'jaz-e-Ahmadi
Tajalliyat-e-Ilahiyyah
His writings are important when examining the beliefs of the movement because the principal claims of Qadianiyyah can be examined through the founder's own statements.
The Main Beliefs of Qadianiyyah
The movement contains a number of teachings that distinguish it from orthodox Islamic belief. The most important concern the following matters.
1. The Claim of Prophethood
The fundamental issue is the claim of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad concerning prophethood.
Orthodox Islam holds that Muhammad ﷺ was the final Prophet, and that no prophet will come after him.
Allah says:
وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ
“And the Seal of the Prophets.”
Qur'an 33:40
The Prophet ﷺ said:
«لَا نَبِيَّ بَعْدِي»
“There is no prophet after me.”
Sahih al-Bukhari, 3532; Sahih Muslim, 2286
(Numbering may differ according to edition.)
Consequently, the belief that a new prophet appeared after Muhammad ﷺ is incompatible with this fundamental principle of Islam.
2. Revelation After the Prophet ﷺ
Qadiani writings attribute forms of divine revelation and inspiration to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and give his revelations a religious authority that orthodox Islam does not recognize.
Islam, however, teaches that the prophetic revelation associated with the coming of prophets ended with Muhammad ﷺ.
3. The Promised Messiah and Mahdi
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad identified himself as the Promised Messiah and Mahdi. Muslims believe in the coming of the true Messiah, ʿIsa ibn Maryam عليه السلام, and in the authentic teachings concerning the Mahdi.
The identification of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as the final prophetic figure is therefore rejected by the mainstream Muslim understanding of these doctrines.
4. Differences Concerning Islamic Law
The Qadiani movement also developed distinctive interpretations concerning Islamic law, prophethood, jihad, revelation and other fundamental theological matters.
Because these issues are extensive, each should be examined through the movement's own authoritative writings rather than through isolated quotations or accusations made by opponents.
Important Figures in the Movement
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
Founder of the movement and the central figure around whom its theology developed.
Hakim Nuruddin
After the death of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad in 1908, Hakim Nuruddin became the first Khalifah of the Ahmadiyya movement.
Mirza Bashir-ud-Din Mahmud Ahmad
He succeeded Nuruddin and became the movement's second Khalifah. He was the son of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and became one of the most influential figures in developing and spreading Qadiani teachings.
Muhammad Ali
Muhammad Ali became a leading figure of the Lahore Ahmadiyya movement, which separated from the main Qadiani organization after disagreements concerning the interpretation of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's status.
The Lahore group generally described Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a mujaddid and reformer rather than an independent prophet, although Muslim scholars have continued to regard the Lahore movement as outside orthodox Islam because of its fundamental theological connection with Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.
The Lahore and Qadiani Branches
After the death of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, differences arose among his followers.
The two principal branches became:
The Qadiani/Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, which maintained the doctrine of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's prophethood in its distinctive interpretation.
The Lahore Ahmadiyya Movement, which generally rejected describing him as an independent prophet and instead emphasized his status as a reformer and messianic figure.
Despite these differences, Muslim scholars have examined both movements in light of their fundamental beliefs concerning Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the finality of Prophethood.
The Position of Muslim Scholars
Muslim scholars throughout the twentieth century examined the claims and writings of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and concluded that the Qadiani doctrine concerning prophethood contradicts an essential principle of Islam.
One important scholarly body that addressed the matter was the Islamic Fiqh Council
(Majmaʿ al-Fiqh al-Islami) of the Muslim World League.
After examining the claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the beliefs of the Qadiani and Lahore movements, the Council stated that the claim of prophethood and revelation after Muhammad ﷺ contradicts the established principle that Prophethood ended with Muhammad ﷺ.
The Council consequently ruled that those who affirm such a claim are outside Islam.
Reference: Majmaʿ al-Fiqh al-Islami, p. 13.
A number of other major Muslim scholarly institutions and councils have likewise issued rulings concerning the Qadiani movement.
What About a Person Who Accepts Qadianiyyah?
The question often arises: What is the ruling on a person who is not himself a Qadiani but believes that Qadianiyyah is a valid madhhab or sect within Islam?
The answer requires an important distinction.
The theological doctrine itself can be judged in light of the Qur'an, Sunnah and established Islamic creed. The belief that a prophet came after Muhammad ﷺ contradicts the explicit texts concerning the finality of Prophethood.
However, judging a specific individual requires consideration of what that person actually believes, understands and has been taught. General rulings concerning a sect should not be confused with the process of declaring a particular individual an apostate.
This distinction is recognized in Islamic scholarship between takfir al-mutlaq (a general ruling concerning a belief or statement) and takfir al-muʿayyan (declaring a particular individual to be a disbeliever), which has conditions and requires knowledge and proper judgment.
Therefore, Muslims should not take individual declarations of takfir lightly or make themselves judges over other people.
The Finality of Prophethood
The foundation of the Islamic position is clear.
Allah سبحانه وتعالى says:
مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ ... وَلَٰكِنْ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ
“Muhammad is ... the Messenger of Allah and the Seal of the Prophets.”
Qur'an 33:40
And the Prophet ﷺ said:
«لَا نَبِيَّ بَعْدِي»
“There is no prophet after me.”
This doctrine is not a minor difference in Islamic jurisprudence. It concerns one of the fundamental principles of Islamic belief.
For this reason, Muslim scholars have consistently distinguished Qadianiyyah from the recognized schools of Islamic jurisprudence and theology.
Conclusion
Qadianiyyah is a movement founded by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian. Its central theological claims concerning Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's messianic status, revelation and prophethood are fundamentally different from the orthodox Islamic doctrine of the finality of Muhammad ﷺ.
The Qur'an explicitly describes Muhammad ﷺ as خَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ — the Seal of the Prophets, while the Prophet ﷺ stated plainly:
«لَا نَبِيَّ بَعْدِي»
“There is no prophet after me.”
For this reason, major Muslim scholarly bodies have ruled that the Qadiani doctrine concerning prophethood is outside the boundaries of Islamic belief.
At the same time, Muslims should distinguish between explaining the ruling on a belief or sect and passing judgment upon a specific individual. The latter requires knowledge, evidence and fulfillment of the relevant scholarly conditions.
And Allah knows best.
Selected References
The Holy Qur'an, 33:40
Sahih al-Bukhari, Book of Prophets
Sahih Muslim, Book of Faith and Virtues
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Barahin-e-Ahmadiyya
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Izala-e-Auham
Ehsan Elahi Zaheer, Qadianiyyat: An Analytical Survey
Dr. Maniʿ Hammad al-Juhani, Al-Mawsuʿah al-
Muyassarah fi al-Adyan wa al-Madhahib wa al-Ahzab al-Muʿasirah
Majmaʿ al-Fiqh al-Islami, p. 13
No comments:
Post a Comment